One of the common themes in internal communication that has never sat well with me is the idea of egalitarianismâ€”that all internal communication should treat all employees, or all employees of a hierarchical class, on an equal basis.
There are some places where egalitarianism has its place in the corporate worldâ€”compliance with codes of conduct and adherence to agreed processes and values being obvious choices.
In internal communication, the idea that all employees should be treated equally is often counter-productive, and manifests itself in a number of ways.
It lives in measurements that focus on raw numbers, like a focus on views and hits on Intranet articles.
It fuels the never-ending drive to sanitize content and simplify language, so that it reaches the most apathetic corners of the organisation with minimum offense.
And it bankrolls the persistent insistence on all-employee â€œsheep-dipâ€ workshops, conferences, and â€œengage-athons.â€
But as seductive and intuitive as the idea of â€œgetting everyone on the same pageâ€ may be for executives, budget-holders and engage-athon vendors, an alternative approach is beginning to gain momentum.
My name for the alternative is â€œselective engagementâ€.
My definitionÂ of selective engagement is the effort to change organisational direction, or improve organisational performance, by identifying, connecting and mobilising the organisationâ€™s most influential people in the pursuit of one or more common objectives.
Selective Engagement aims for efficiency with effectiveness.Â Lower costs, higher impact, and reduced alienation and irritation.
Itâ€™s about reducing the number of people targeted by communication, increasing the depth of content and expanding the resonance of social connections.
Moreover, by targeting a small number of influential people; messages and intentions actually spread as widely as they do through broadcast or even â€œsheep-dipâ€ communication.Â The added credibility coming from the involvement of these formal and informal leaders who spread and connect the message helps move beyond mere awareness and towards active adoption.
One of the barriers to this approach in the past is that the research required to do the social mapping and identify the influencers has been seen as cumbersome and expensive.Â Another is that some senior leaders like the idea in principle, but want to choose the participants themselves rather than assess their influence more objectively.
But the approach, finally, is becoming more common.Â Research and mapping are becoming cheaper and easier, and some leaders are becoming more receptive.Â Selective Engagement is generating selective momentum.